今日 31/08/2026 23:00 格尼斯坦 - TPS图尔库 比赛预测。

芬兰超级联赛
格尼斯坦

格尼斯坦

10:01完场
TPS图尔库

TPS图尔库

全场让球
格尼斯坦
TPS图尔库
初盘
-0.5
+0.5
赛前
-0.75
+0.75
全场大小球
大
小
初盘
2.75
u
赛前
2
u
全场胜平负
胜
平
负
初盘
赛前

格尼斯坦格尼斯坦
积极40%
dot icon
Gnistan is maintaining 3rd place in the Veikkausliiga table after 21 matches, with 35 points (equivalent to 1.67 points per game), indicating that Gnistan has a higher chance of competing for the title.
dot icon
Key player Adeleke Akinola Akinyemi is performing impressively with 13 goals, 1 assist, and a high shot-on-target statistic (22), being the cornerstone of the team's attacking play.
dot icon
Gnistan has a stable goal-scoring rate, averaging 1.8 goals per game in the last 10 matches, with several decisive victories such as 4-2 against Mariehamn or 3-2 against Ilves Tampere, demonstrating their ability to control the game and create continuous scoring opportunities.
dot icon
Gnistan is flexibly using various tactical formations (3-4-2-1, 5-4-1, 3-4-3, 3-4-1-2), demonstrating diversity and adaptability to different match situations
中立30%
dot icon
Gnistan is currently in a mixed phase of euphoria and instability, with an inconsistent record in the last 10 matches, but still maintains the top 3 position in the league table.
dot icon
The team's goal difference is +7 after 21 matches, showing a balance between attacking strength and defensive ability, but it's not enough to prove superiority.
dot icon
The 'Over 1.5 goals' rate reached 80.95% in the season, showing that Gnistan frequently participates in highly competitive matches, but not every match ends with a high-scoring result.
dot icon
The loss of personnel due to Evgeny Bashkirov's injury does not seriously affect the lineup, as he only plays as a reserve and is not a key player.
消极30%
dot icon
Gnistan has conceded 13 goals in their last 10 matches, highlighting defensive instability, especially when facing strong teams like Lahti or KuPS
dot icon
Gnistan has received 14 yellow cards (an average of 1.4 per game) in their last 10 matches, showing a lack of focus in confrontations and could affect their playing tactics.
dot icon
Gnistan has only kept a clean sheet once in their last 10 matches, with 5 matches lost without scoring (LTN), indicating significant defensive weaknesses and a tendency to make errors.
TPS图尔库TPS图尔库
积极35%
dot icon
TPS Turku possesses a strong attacking line with consistent goal-scoring ability, demonstrated by 8 goals in the last 10 matches and an average of 2.33 goals per game in the season, showing an effective attacking style and a clear ability to create opportunities.
dot icon
TPS Turku can maintain good form after failures, such as immediately winning 3-0 against AC Oulu after a 1-3 defeat to Ilves Tampere, showing their fighting spirit and quick recovery ability.
dot icon
Some key players such as Albijon Muzaci (8 goals, 1 assist) and Timo Zaal (2 goals, 2 assists) are performing consistently, playing a key role in the attacking style.
中立30%
dot icon
TPS Turku is ranked 7th in the tournament with 30 points after 21 matches, showing a mid-table position but still has a chance to improve to avoid relegation.
dot icon
TPS Turku is tactically flexible, using various formations such as 4-2-3-1, 4-3-3, and 4-4-2 depending on the opponent, demonstrating adaptability and diversity in their playing style.
dot icon
Recent overall performance has shown a balance between wins, draws, and losses, with 8 wins, 6 draws, and 7 losses, indicating no clear trend of being overly strong or weak.
消极35%
dot icon
TPS Turku is going through an unstable performance phase, with a record of D-W-L-W-L-L-W-D-W-D in the last 10 matches, demonstrating inconsistency and an inability to maintain good form
dot icon
The defense of TPS Turku has many gaps, conceding 11 goals in 10 matches (an average of 1.1 goals per game) and only keeping a clean sheet in 7 matches (33.33%), showing a lack of focus and weak defensive ability.
dot icon
TPS Turku has 12 yellow cards and 2 red cards in 10 matches, reflecting a lack of discipline in play and uncontrolled behavior in matches, especially when facing strong teams
dot icon
TPS Turku relies too heavily on key players such as Muzaci and Zaal, while the depth in positions like second striker and center-back is limited, creating risks when facing disadvantages
球员信息

伤病

出战成疑

停赛

国家队征召

其他

Gnistan played with a 3-4-2-1 formation, prioritizing control of the game and creating chances from the flanks, but their unstable defense made them prone to mistakes in defensive situations. Meanwhile, TPS Turku operated flexibly between 4-2-3-1 and 4-3-3 formations, utilizing the quick counter-attacking ability of key players like Albijon Muzaci and Timo Zaal to pressure the opposing defense. Both teams have their own strengths: Gnistan relies on the shooting efficiency of Adeleke Akinola and Joakim Latonen, while TPS Turku depends on their experience against opponents and ability to maintain possession. However, TPS Turku's lack of depth in their squad could become a weakness if Gnistan remains focused and organizes their defense tightly. The match will be a contest between TPS Turku's proactive control and Gnistan's quick, sharp response when forced into a defensive stance.
Prediction for the match between Gnistan Helsinki and TPS Turku is 1-2.
专家预测:
TPS Turku+0.50 @1.96