里耶卡积极50%
Rijeka is experiencing a period of success with a record of 8 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss in their last 10 games, demonstrating exceptional stability in both official matches and friendly games.
Rijeka score regularly (1.5 goals per game) and keep a clean sheet in 70% of matches, showing an effective attacking system and disciplined defense, especially in the victory against HNK Gorica (2-0) and keeping a clean sheet against NK Istra 1961.
Rijeka controls the game effectively with an average of 6.9 corners per match, demonstrating their ability to dominate space and create pressure on the opponent.
Although ranked 73rd out of 100 in professional strength, Rijeka is the only team in the group with the same Power Score (10.0/100) that hasn't lost after two matches, evidence of their ability to maintain stable results.
中立30%
Rijeka receives an average of 1.1 yellow cards per game (11 yellow cards in 10 games), demonstrating a certain lack of discipline on the field, but no red cards, reflecting the ability to control emotions.
The ball control rate reached 60%, showing that Rijeka has the ability to control the game, but it is not enough to comprehensively evaluate their attacking or defensive strength in future matches
消极20%
The absence of Teo Barisic (defender, knee ligament injury) could destabilize the defense, forcing the coach to adjust the formation or strengthen the role of midfielders in defense
Rijeka is in the weakest group of the tournament with a Power Score of only 10.0/100, on par with teams like Ludogorets, SS Virtus, but lacks tactical flexibility due to the lack of data on the remaining 8 matches.
Despite keeping a clean sheet in the draw against NK Istra 1961, Rijeka could not capitalize on the opportunity, showing a lack of sharpness in crucial situations, especially when facing a strong team like Dinamo Zagreb (0-2)
埃尔维斯积极40%
Ilves Tampere demonstrates consistent goal-scoring ability with an average of 1.3 goals per game, including decisive victories such as 3-1 against FC Differdange 03 and 5-4 after extra time against Stjarnan Gardabaer, showcasing an open and proactive attacking style.
Ilves Tampere has a strong fighting spirit, demonstrated through their ability to recover from defeat, such as the 1-0 victory over Lahti immediately after a 1-0 loss to AC Oulu and staging a comeback from 4-5 down against Stjarnan Gardabaer.
A stable personnel framework with key players such as Faris Krkalić (goalkeeper), Tatu Miettunen, Matias Rale (defender), Anton Popovitch, Jardell Kanga (midfielder), and Teemu Hytönen (forward) plays a central role, creating harmony in the playing style.
Flexibility in tactics, with the ability to change formations from 3-4-2-1 to 4-2-3-1 without compromising the effectiveness of play, demonstrates the coach's good adaptability.
中立30%
Ilves Tampere maintains a disciplined defensive style, keeping a clean sheet in their last two matches (0-0 draw with FC Differdange 03 and 1-0 win against Stjarnan Gardabaer), but their attacking performance is limited, with only 1 goal in 4 games.
The ball control rate reached 54% in recent matches, demonstrating a balance between attack and defense, but no clear dominance is evident on the field
消极30%
Ilves Tampere is going through an unstable form period, especially in important matches, with a sequence of results: D-L-L-D-W-W-L-W-W-L, including several close losses (1-0 against AC Oulu, HJK Helsinki) and a heavy defeat (2-1 against Stjarnan Gardabaer in the Europa Conference League)
Inconsistent defensive performance, especially when facing strong opponents, such as losing 1-0 in the Europa Conference League and losing 2-1 to HJK Helsinki
Weak disciplinary conduct in matches, with 17 yellow cards (an average of 1.7 per game) and 2 red cards (in the 3-1 match against FC Differdange 03 and the 2-1 match against HJK Helsinki), affecting the ability to control the match
The personnel strength has been affected due to the absence of Sebastian Suvanne (defender) in the last 10 matches, creating a challenge for the defense when facing Ilves Tampere's wing attacks.
Ilves Tampere is ranked 71/100 in the professional power ranking with a Power Score of 12.5/100, indicating poor performance and a large gap with the teams ranked above.
伤病
出战成疑
停赛
国家队征召
其他
Rijeka demonstrated superior tactical composure with a disciplined defense and dominant ball control, creating an active game and minimizing the opponent's counterattack opportunities. Meanwhile, Ilves Tampere relied on an open and effective style from set pieces, however, the lack of balance in their formation made them vulnerable when facing Rijeka's well-organized defense. Rijeka's organizational level across both lines allowed them to maintain control, while maximizing quick transitions to create breakthroughs, whereas Ilves Tampere lacked depth to consistently threaten in long-ball situations. The difference in control ability and scoring potential between the two teams clearly reflects the disparity in tactical quality, although Ilves Tampere could still create chances from set pieces due to their high corner kick ratio.
Prediction for the match between Rijeka and Ilves Tampere is 3-0.
专家预测:
Rijeka-2.00 @1.81


















































